Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Enzo Wallart vs Henry Searle Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wallart vs Searle analysis and find out who is favored!
Enzo Wallart vs Henry Searle Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wallart has won 47.7% of points on his second serve, while Searle has won 52.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wallart, in recent form, has won 55.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Searle has won 45.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.29% and 30.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wallart has saved 61.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Searle has saved 69.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wallart has won 56.6% of matches played (W/L 30/ 23), with Searle winning 55.56% (W/L 20/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wallart has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 13/ 14). Searle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 11/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Wallart has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 17), where as Searle has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wallart has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.23 while Searle has played against players with an average rank of 227.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wallart has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Searle has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wallart has converted 47.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Searle has converted 51.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wallart 0 - 0 Searle
650
Rank
594
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
722
Rank
718
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
55% (102-83)
Career Total W/L
50% (22-22)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Enzo Wallart | Henry Searle |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 55% (12/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (23/19) | 54% (27/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (210/189) | 52% (256/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (10/9) | 80% (4/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.46 |
| Aces Total | 88 | 110 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 43 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:47 | 1:47:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 129.58 | 280.32 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (815/1293) | 66% (1054/1600) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (559/815) | 69% (729/1054) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (228/478) | 53% (288/546) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (57/119) | 51% (56/109) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (510/1252) | 36% (543/1503) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (8/7) | 60% (9/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (9/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 15% (13/2) |
Enzo Wallart Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Enzo Wallart
Player
Mitchell Harper
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Enzo Wallart
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enzo Wallart
Player
Niklas Schell
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Wallart
Player
James Beaven
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Enzo Wallart
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
33
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Wallart
Player
Toby Martin
70%
(
96 of
138)
1st Serve %
65%
(
84 of
129)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
52 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
129)
133
Total Points Won
134
|
7-6(5) 5-7 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Enzo Wallart
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Loge
Player
Enzo Wallart
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 5-6 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Wallart
Player
Pietro Pampanin
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Enzo Wallart
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Henry Searle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Henry Searle
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Emile Hudd
85%
(
55 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Paul Jubb
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Robin Bertrand
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Adam Jones
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Jeff Wolf
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Henry Searle
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Wallart Vs Searle Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Enzo Wallart
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
